Can Lifetime Gifts Be Recovered Into the Estate?
Can Lifetime Gifts Be Recovered Into the Estate?
Inheritance disputes centred on lifetime gifts are not uncommon. Many people give away assets during their lifetime, but problems often arise after death when beneficiaries relying on a will discover that property has already been transferred, savings moved, or valuable assets given away.
For families, the issue is not just what was left behind, but what is missing. The legal route you take depends on how the transfer was made, why it happened, and whether there is strong enough evidence to support recovering assets into the estate.
What counts as a lifetime gift
A lifetime gift is any voluntary transfer of assets made while someone is alive, without receiving anything in return. That can include property, money, investments, or personal possessions.
When gifts can be challenged
The key issue is not whether the transfer was formal, but whether it was valid. A gift must be made freely, by someone of sound mind and by someone who understood what they were doing.
Even when a transfer involved solicitors or formal paperwork, it could still be open to challenge if those conditions were not met.
There is no automatic right to reverse a lifetime gift, even where the outcome feels unfair. In lifetime gifts and inheritance disputes, the court looks carefully at how the transfer came about and whether it reflects a genuine decision by the person who made it.
In practice, certain scenarios come up again and again.
- A decision carries consequences that the person didn’t understand
Example scenario
Shortly before moving into care, a parent gives their home to one child. After their death, the rest of the family discover that the main asset of the estate is no longer there.
The issue here may be whether they understood the full effect of what they were doing – that they were giving away their main asset and changing what would be left for others.
In Re Beaney, the court made clear that the level of understanding required is not fixed. A minor gift requires a lower level of understanding, but giving away a major asset such as a home requires a clear appreciation of what is being done and its consequences for others.
For someone looking at a situation like this after the event, the question is whether that level of understanding was really there at the time.
If that level of understanding was not there, the gift itself may be set aside, meaning the asset can be treated as part of the estate again.
- A transfer of assets seems to have been driven by someone else
Example scenario
A new partner moves in and gradually takes over the person’s day-to-day finances – dealing with bank accounts, speaking to advisers, and handling paperwork. Over time, savings are transferred and a property is signed into their name. There is no single point at which a decision is discussed or recorded. Other family members only become aware after the transactions have been completed, when the assets are no longer part of the estate.
The question is whether the decision to make the gifts was made freely.
Where the person who benefits has been closely involved in arranging the transfer, the court looks carefully at whether the decision was truly the donor’s own, or whether it resulted from undue influence.
Where undue influence is established, the gift can be undone and the asset brought back into the estate. In certain cases, where gifts are between people with certain relationships, the undue influence can be presumed and that person would then need to try and prove the gift was not made as a result of undue influence.
- The gift affects someone who depended on them financially
Example scenario
A parent gives away a substantial sum not long before their death, leaving little for someone who had relied on them financially.
This in itself does not undo the gift. In limited circumstances, it may be taken into account when deciding what financial provision should be made for dependants under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, rather than being returned to the estate itself.
- A gift conflicts with what had been planned
Example scenario
An individual has, for years, made it clear how they intend their estate to be divided. That position is reflected in earlier documents or discussions. Shortly before their death, a significant asset is transferred in a way that does not fit with that arrangement, without any clear change being recorded at the time.
The concern here is not simply that the outcome is different, but that there is no clear point at which that change was made or explained.
On its own, a change like this is not enough to set a gift aside. But where there is no clear explanation for it, it often becomes part of the evidence when looking at whether the gift was made freely and with proper understanding.
Deprivation of assets
A separate issue arises where assets are given away before someone enters care.
This is often referred to as deprivation of assets. It is not part of inheritance law, but a care funding issue dealt with by local authorities during the person’s lifetime.
If a local authority considers that a gift was made with the intention to reduce care fees, it can treat the asset as if it were still owned by that person when assessing what they should pay. The test is whether avoiding care costs was a significant reason for the gift.
For families, this can come as a surprise. A gift that cannot be challenged through the courts may still be considered for care funding purposes, which can affect the person receiving care or, in some cases, the recipient of the gift.
How Will Claim Can Help
Most estate disputes focus on what has been left behind and how it should be divided. Here, the issue is what is no longer there, and whether it can be brought back into account at all.
It is not always obvious whether your circumstances meet the level where you can take legal action. So, it’s always worth getting expert advice to determine if the position can realistically be changed, or whether the gift has to be left as it stands.
At Willclaim, we look at the entire situation and give you a clear view on whether anything can be done about it, and what that would involve if you decided to go ahead.
In some cases, we are able to act on a no win, no fee basis.
If you would like to discuss your case with one of our team, please contact us for your free claim assessment.